Canel woman called it freedom when - not as long as "Finnish" relations are institutionalized - force their students according to their "own way allowed to go" (Sylvia Canel in: Die Zeit, 29.9.2009, S . 17). What is the freedom of one's own path? In it, not six years to learn together - as a result of "coercive politics"? In the orientation of the various "power"?
The "own way" in both cases is not a separate, but predetermined. The "freedom" argument is used here trimmed affirmative. The
playing it, undifferentiated, to capture the facts theoretically useless term "force" acts obstructions.
The extension system is ideological, the perception of special interests for the standing reference to "freedom," "demand-orientation", "power" and "own way" is not?
0 comments:
Post a Comment